This is an outdated version published on 2023-12-31. Read the most recent version.

A comparative study between buckling behaviour and statistical analysis of axially loaded fully encased composite columns made with high strength concrete

Authors

  • SASIKUMAR P JCT College of Engineering and Technology, Anna University, Coimbatore (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.22.3.694

Keywords:

High strength concrete, fully encased composite columns, buckling behavior, finite element analysis.

Abstract

This research presents a buckling behaviour of axially loaded fully encased composite columns made with high strength concrete (HSC). Additionally, the research includes experimental study, numerical analysis, and statistical analysis. Three fully encased composite columns (FECC) cast with different cross sections are 200mm x 200mm, 230mm x 200mm, 250mm x 200mm, and 2800mm, respectively. The FECC specimens were made with 80MPa grade of concrete and ISMB 100 x 50 x 7 x 4.2 steel section, including the experimental, analytical, and numerical analyses. The buckling resistance of FECC specimen results were compared to Euro code – 1994 and American Institute of Steel of Construction 360 – 2010 codes. Finite element analysis (FEM) studied the FECC specimens and predicted the buckling resistance compared to the experimental test results. The FEM analysis closely correlated to the experimental results. The statistical analysis was performed on the FECC specimens with current design codes and previous experimental research work. The statistical study compared the experimental test results of buckling resistance and flexural stiffness of FECC specimens to the predicted values from codes. The numerical and statistical analysis results were compared to the experimental test results. Also, it is highly correlated and helps the performance of columns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACI 318-08, Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–08) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, USA, 2008.

AISC 360-10, Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago, American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), USA, 2010.

Begum, M., Driver, R.G. & Elwi, A.E. (2007). Numerical Simulations of the Behaviour of Partially Encased Composite Columns.

Begum, M., Driver, R.G. & Elwi, A.E. (2013). Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength concrete. Engineering Structure, 56, 1718–1727.

Campian, C., Haupt-Karp, A., Pop, M., Chira, N. G. & Urian, P. (2014). Behavior of fully encased steel-concrete composite columns subjected to mono-tonic and cyclic loading. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 12 (1), 81–88.

Campian, C., Nagy, Z. & Pop, M. (2015). Behavior of fully encased steel-concrete composite columns subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading. Proce-dia Engineering, 117, 439–451.

Chen, C.C., & Yeh, S.C. (1996). Ultimate strength of concrete encased steel composite columns, Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Struc-tural Engineering, 2197–2206.

Claeson, C. & Gylltoft, K. (1998). Slender high-strength concrete columns subjected to eccentric loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124 (3), 233–240.

Ellobody, E. & Young, B. (2011). Numerical simulation of concrete encased steel composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67, 211–222.

EN 1994-1-1: Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures. General Rules and Rules for Buildings, 2004.

Kim, C.S., Park, H.G., Chung, K.S. & Choi, I.R. (2012). Eccentric axial load testing for concrete encased steel columns using 800 MPa steel and 100 MPa concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138 (8), 1019–1031.

Kim, C.S., Park, H.G., Chung, K.S. & Choi, I.R. (2013). Eccentric axial load capacity of high strength steel-concrete composite columns of various section-al shapes. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140 (4), 04013091.

Lai, B., Liew, J.R. & Wang, T. (2019). Buckling behaviour of high strength concrete encased steel composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 154, 27-42.

Matsui, C. (1979). Study on elasto-plastic behaviour of concrete-encased columns subjected to eccentric axial thrust, Annual Assembly of Architectural Institute of Japan, 1627–1628.

Munoz, P.R. & Hsu, C.T. (1997). Biaxially loaded concrete-encased composite columns: design equation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123 (12), 1576–1585.

Pereirala, M.F., De Nardin, S. & El Debs, A.L. (2016). Structural behavior of partially encased composite columns under axial loads. Steel Composite Structure, 20 (6), 1305–1322.

TG20. SS. (1979). A specification for the design of steel-concrete composite columns. AISC Engineering Journal, 16 (4), 101–115.

Tokgoz, S. & Dundar, C. (2008). Experimental tests on biaxially loaded concrete-encased composite columns. Steel Composite Structure, 8 (5), 423–438.

Tsai, K.C., Lien, Y. & Chen, C.C. (1996). Behaviour of axially loaded steel reinforced concrete columns. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hy-draulic Engineering, 8 (4), 535–545.

Wang, C.H. (2007). Experimental Study on Buckling Capacity of Slender Steel Reinforced Concrete Columns Subjected to Eccentric Load, Master diss Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology.

Yu, Q. & Lu, Z.D. (2009). Research on the static performance of eccentric steel reinforced concrete column. Building Structure, 39 (6), 34–38.

Han., Z. (2004). The Study on the Stability Bearing Capacity of Steel Reinforced High- Strength Concrete Long Columns. Master diss. Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology.

Zhu, W.Q., Meng, G. & Jia, J.Q. (2014). Experimental studies on axial load performance of high-strength concrete short columns. Proceedings of the Insti-tution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 167(9), 509-519.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

Versions

How to Cite

P, S. (2023). A comparative study between buckling behaviour and statistical analysis of axially loaded fully encased composite columns made with high strength concrete. Revista De La Construcción. Journal of Construction, 22(3), 694–706. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.22.3.694

Most read articles by the same author(s)